BP's rivals shift in Russian tussle
The fate of the second biggest foreign investment in Russia hangs in the balance amid signs of a shifting mood in the Kremlin which may have wrong-footed investors and one of the world's biggest oil companies.
Raided by security services, its board paralysed, key technical experts barred from working and deluged with court cases and labour inspections, TNK-BP is a struggling $38 billion (19 billion pound) oil company producing as much crude as Britain.
As investors scrutinise the saga to read the runes for future projects in Russia, signs are multiplying that the root of the dispute may not be in the Kremlin but rather the boardrooms of Russian billionaires. Even that is uncertain.
TNK-BP, a highly lucrative 50-50 joint venture between BP and four Russian-connected billionaires, began in 2003 amid much fanfare in a deal blessed by then-president Vladimir Putin. It produces a quarter of BP's global oil output and posted a net profit of $5.7 billion last year.
TNK-BP's first five years were a success story. Former BP managers working at the venture talk with pride of how they improved management of oilfields using the latest technology, cut back leaks, and boosted operating efficiency.
But its ownership structure, which gives management control to a foreign oil major, became an anachronism following a Kremlin-led drive from 2003 which took back under the state's wing control of all big Russian energy assets.
So when a campaign against TNK-BP suddenly started this year involving tax police, alleged labour code violations, security service sweeps and court cases, many assumed the Kremlin was pressuring the firm to accept a state partner.
A similar barrage of official harassment was unleashed in 2006 against Royal Dutch Shell to force it to sell a controlling stake in its giant Sakhalin gas venture to Russia's state-dominated energy champion Gazprom.
This looked like a replay, but there have been repeated statements from officials, including President Dmitry Medvedev, that the state does not want a stake.
"Something has changed in the past few months... The government has changed. Players have moved around. Power is more dispersed," said a source close to BP, speaking on condition of anonymity like most in this case because of its sensitivity.
- 1 RBS gets Chinese approval for Suzhou stake
- 2 June retail sales fall less than expected
- 3 Birth control battle weighs on Philippine economy
- 4 Saudi Telecom in sponsorship deal with Man United
- 5 Glasgow loss deals blow to Labour
- 6 Besley says fighting inflation tough task
- 7 Asia stocks at two-year low
- 1 Banks may avoid worst of household debt pain
- 2 FAA proposes 3.8 million fine against American
- 3 Swaps spreads highlight credit stresses
- 4 Slower economy saps climate action
- 5 Besley says fighting inflation tough task
- 6 Poll shows leader swap would not save Labour
- 7 Weak sterling may not curb recession
- 1 RBS gets Chinese approval for Suzhou stake
- 2 Buyout group raises offer for Australia's Indophil
- 3 Nat Exp and Stagecoach on rail bid shortlist
- 4 Tolent posts fall in first-half pretax profit
- 5 HP results top Wall Street targets
- 6 Apple updates iPhone software to fix glitches
- 7 BAA set for break-up
|
|















Medvedev vows to uphold Putin legacy



